<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal for the History of Islamic Civilization</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-7906</Issn>
				<Volume>46</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ghulām Ḥusayn Junpūrī’s Principles of Optics</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Ghulām Ḥusayn Junpūrī’s Principles of Optics</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>237</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>257</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">63776</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jhic.2017.237268.653786</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Iraj</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nikseresht</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Naaem</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sherafat</LastName>
<Affiliation>university of Imam Khomeini</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The present article discusses and criticizes the chapter two of &lt;em&gt;Bahādurkkhānī’s Jāmī‘&lt;/em&gt; on optics. The basic question is the extent to which this book is influenced by old book of optics. The main hypothesis is that despite all scientific advances in new optics, &lt;em&gt;Bahādurkkhānī’s Jāmī‘&lt;/em&gt; still relies on optics of ancient Greece and his Islamic era and does not step beyond Euclidean mathematics. According to his references to geometric relationships and the last astronomical discoveries we can say that Bahādurkkhānī probably was aware of the latest advances in new geometric optics. As a result, optics and mathematics had a strong geometric aspect in the India of 19&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; century without deep philosophical aspects.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The present article discusses and criticizes the chapter two of &lt;em&gt;Bahādurkkhānī’s Jāmī‘&lt;/em&gt; on optics. The basic question is the extent to which this book is influenced by old book of optics. The main hypothesis is that despite all scientific advances in new optics, &lt;em&gt;Bahādurkkhānī’s Jāmī‘&lt;/em&gt; still relies on optics of ancient Greece and his Islamic era and does not step beyond Euclidean mathematics. According to his references to geometric relationships and the last astronomical discoveries we can say that Bahādurkkhānī probably was aware of the latest advances in new geometric optics. As a result, optics and mathematics had a strong geometric aspect in the India of 19&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; century without deep philosophical aspects.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Bahādurkkhānī’s Jāmī'</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ghulām Ḥusayn Junpūrī</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Principles of optics</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jhic.ut.ac.ir/article_63776_6550b0d9b74e03c965322672e96428c6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
