نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه هنرهای نمایشی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران،
2 دانشیار، گروه هنرهای نمایشی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد ادبیات نمایشی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران،
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Gholām-Hossein Sā'edi is considered one of the most acclaimed authors in contemporary Iranian literature and theater, often regarded as a pillar of Iranian playwriting. A notable feature of his dramatic works is the frequent reference to the conflict between dominant and subordinate social and economic groups. Consequently, many experts and scholars have examined Sā'edi's works based on their political and social themes. A study of these works reveals that, in many instances, this class conflict results in the formation of a type of dominance. This research is a descriptive-analytical study that analyzes the concept of "dominance" (or authority) in three of Sā'edi’s plays: Chub be-dast-hāye Varazil, Behtarin Bābā-ye Donyā and Ā-ye bi Kolāh, Ā-ye bā Kolāh, based on Max Weber's theories. One of the main differences between Weber's views and other theories related to dominance is Weber's more detailed categorization. In fact, Max Weber examines dominance not merely as a one-dimensional concept but as a multifaceted phenomenon comprising three subsets: legal-rational dominance, traditional dominance, and charismatic dominance. The findings of this research indicate that although all three analyzed works relate to the concept of dominance, they present different forms of this concept. Analyzing these works through the lens of Weber's theories on dominance can enhance our understanding of the similarities and differences in these plays and, in addition to aiding in the analysis of character development, tone, and atmosphere in these works, help us better comprehend the lawless world and the roots of social crisis formation depicted in these plays.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)