نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیارگروه تاریخ تمدن اسلامی، دانشکده تاریخ، سیره و تمدن اسلامی، جامعة المصطفی العالمیه، قم، ایران،
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The translation movement, which emerged during the ʿAbbāsid Caliphate, is recognized as one of the most significant scientific developments in the history of Islamic civilization. Diverse perspectives exist regarding its objectives, outcomes, and implications. While many support this intellectual endeavor, others have voiced opposition. Among the latter is the Maktab-i Tafkīk (Separation School), a contemporary intellectual trend critical of the movement. Employing a descriptive-analytical approach, this article explores and critiques the reasons for this opposition. The study finds that the primary objections of the Maktab-i Tafkīk include the perceived self-sufficiency of religion and religious knowledge, the allegedly malevolent motives of the ʿAbbāsid caliphs and translators, and the purportedly harmful consequences of the movement for Islamic society. These objections are open to critique, particularly in relation to the school’s approach to reason and science, its contradictions with religious teachings encouraging intellectual inquiry, its failure to provide adequate evidence for the claimed malevolent intentions of the ʿAbbāsid rulers, the absence of explicit rejections of the translation movement by the Imāms, and the neglect of the movement’s positive contributions to the intellectual flourishing of Islamic civilization.
کلیدواژهها [English]